CONTENTS

Exercise: American put-call parity bounds

For American options on a non-dividend-paying stock, put-call parity becomes an inequality (not equality):
S0KC0AmP0AmS0KerT.S_0 - K \le C^{\text{Am}}_0 - P^{\text{Am}}_0 \le S_0 - Ke^{-rT}.

Tasks

  1. Upper bound. Prove the upper bound CAmPAmS0KerTC^{\text{Am}} - P^{\text{Am}} \le S_0 - Ke^{-rT} by comparing with European equivalents and using the fact that an American option is worth at least as much as the corresponding European.
  2. Lower bound. Prove the lower bound CAmPAmS0KC^{\text{Am}} - P^{\text{Am}} \ge S_0 - K by a direct arbitrage argument: if CAmPAm<S0KC^{\text{Am}} - P^{\text{Am}} < S_0 - K, buy the call, short the stock, invest cash at rate rr — show this is riskless.
  3. Call never exercised early (no dividends). Argue using the bounds or directly that for a non-dividend-paying stock, early exercise of an American call is never optimal, so CAm=CEurC^{\text{Am}} = C^{\text{Eur}}.
  4. American put exercised early. Give a numerical example where PAm>PEurP^{\text{Am}} > P^{\text{Eur}}: specifically, for a deeply in-the-money put, compare the exercise value KSK - S with the hold value. For S0=10S_0 = 10, K=100K = 100, r=0.05r = 0.05, T=1T = 1, σ=0.3\sigma = 0.3: verify numerically that PAmKS0=90P^{\text{Am}} \approx K - S_0 = 90 (exercise now) while PEur<90P^{\text{Eur}} < 90.
  5. With dividends. The American-call-never-exercised-early result fails when the stock pays dividends. Why?

Hint

For part 3, combine the bound CAmS0KerTC^{\text{Am}} \ge S_0 - Ke^{-rT} with CAm0C^{\text{Am}} \ge 0 (option value non-negative) and S0KS0KerTS_0 - K \le S_0 - Ke^{-rT} to show the exercise value S0KS_0 - K is dominated by the hold value.