CONTENTS

Exercise: Probability Zero Is Not Impossible

Prerequisites: Probability Space

Problem

One of the most persistent misconceptions in probability is conflating "probability zero" with "impossible."

  1. Let UUniform[0,1]U \sim \text{Uniform}[0, 1], defined on the probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P}) with Ω=[0,1]\Omega = [0, 1], F=B([0,1])\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{B}([0,1]), and P\mathbb{P} Lebesgue measure. Compute P(U=0.5)\mathbb{P}(U = 0.5). Is the event {U=0.5}\{U = 0.5\} impossible?

  2. More generally, for any x[0,1]x \in [0, 1], compute P(U=x)\mathbb{P}(U = x). What does this say about individual outcomes in a continuous probability space?

  3. In a continuous stock price model, P(ST=K)=0\mathbb{P}(S_T = K) = 0 for every fixed KK. A trader argues: "The probability of expiring exactly at-the-money is zero, so I don't need to worry about it." Identify the flaw in this reasoning. What concept should the trader use instead?

  4. Let AA be any event with P(A)=0\mathbb{P}(A) = 0. Must A=A = \emptyset? Let BB be any event with P(B)=1\mathbb{P}(B) = 1. Must B=ΩB = \Omega?

Hint

For part 1, recall that P([a,b])=ba\mathbb{P}([a, b]) = b - a for Lebesgue measure. For part 3, think about what quantity actually matters for option pricing near the strike.

Jump to the solution when you're ready.