Random Variables
Motivation: why this matters in quant finance
Bertsekas introduces random variables by asking how probabilities of numerical values are induced from probabilities of underlying outcomes. That direction matters. The model does not start with a histogram floating in space; it starts with outcomes , then a function , then probabilities such as or .
The informal idea
A random variable is a measurement rule. It looks at the realised outcome and reports a number. If is the complete future market path, then
- reports the terminal stock price,
- reports the call payoff,
- reports whether a digital call pays,
- reports the log return.
The distribution of forgets the identity of the original outcome and remembers only how much probability lands on each numerical value or interval. That loss of detail is useful, but it is also dangerous: a terminal distribution alone does not tell you what happened along the way.
Formal definitions
Random variable
Measurability means
Equivalently, for every Borel set . The shorter condition with half-lines is enough because half-lines generate the Borel sigma-algebra.
Distribution and CDF
Bertsekas uses the CDF as the common language for discrete and continuous random variables: every random variable has a CDF, even when it has neither a convenient PMF nor a smooth PDF.
Discrete and continuous cases
If takes countably many values , its PMF is
If has a density , then
Key properties
Random variables push probability forward
The event is a subset of , but the distribution is a probability on numerical sets . This is why the same abstract probability space can support many financial quantities at once.
The CDF characterises the distribution
Knowing for every determines the law of . For integer-valued ,
For continuous with differentiable CDF,
Functions of random variables remain random variables
If for a measurable function , then is a random variable. Payoffs are built this way: . The law of is derived from the law of plus the transformation .
Several random variables require joint structure
Marginal distributions of and do not determine the joint distribution. A two-asset option needs the joint law of , not only the two separate terminal distributions. Dependence enters through the joint law.
Equality has multiple meanings
Random variables can be equal pointwise, equal almost surely, or equal in distribution. In probability and finance, almost-sure equality is usually the operational notion: changing a payoff on a null event does not change its price.
Worked examples
Example 1: terminal stock price and payoff
In a one-period model with ,
For a call with strike ,
so and . The payoff is a random variable derived from the price random variable.
Example 2: a CDF from a discrete PMF
Let be the number of heads in two fair coin tosses. Then
Its CDF is a step function:
The jumps of the CDF are the point probabilities.
Example 3: why the joint law matters
Suppose two assets each have return or with probability . If they always move together, an equally weighted portfolio has return or . If one always rises when the other falls, the same portfolio has return with certainty. The marginal distributions are identical; the joint distribution changes the risk completely.
Common confusions and pitfalls
Where this goes next
- Expectation and Variance: Averages and dispersion are defined for random variables, not for abstract outcomes directly.
- Independence and Conditioning: Joint laws, conditional laws, and information updates require random variables.
- Sigma-Algebras: Measurability is the link between random variables and event collections.
- Normal Distribution: The central continuous law for log returns and Brownian increments.
- Log-Normal Distribution: The distribution of prices when log returns are normal.
References
- Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (2008). Introduction to Probability (2nd ed.). Athena Scientific. Ch. 2 §2.2 (Probability Mass Functions), §2.3 (Functions of Random Variables), Ch. 3 §3.2 (Cumulative Distribution Functions).