CONTENTS

Exercise: Risk-Neutral Pricing of a European Call Under GBM

Problem

Under the risk-neutral measure Q\mathbb{Q}, a stock follows dSt=rStdt+σStdWtQdS_t = rS_t\,dt + \sigma S_t\,dW_t^{\mathbb{Q}} with r=0.04r = 0.04, σ=0.30\sigma = 0.30, S0=100S_0 = 100. Consider a European call with strike K=105K = 105 and maturity T=0.5T = 0.5 (six months).

The fair price is C0=erTEQ[(STK)+]C_0 = e^{-rT}\mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{Q}}[(S_T - K)^+].

  1. Price the option by Monte Carlo using N=1,000,000N = 1{,}000{,}000 risk-neutral GBM paths. Report the estimate and a 95% confidence interval.
  2. Compute the Black-Scholes closed-form price C0=S0Φ(d1)KerTΦ(d2)C_0 = S_0\Phi(d_1) - Ke^{-rT}\Phi(d_2) and compare to the Monte Carlo estimate.
  3. Estimate the exercise probability Q(ST>K)\mathbb{Q}(S_T > K) from the same simulation, and compare to the closed-form Φ(d2)\Phi(d_2).
  4. The "real-world" drift under P\mathbb{P} for this stock is μ=0.10\mu = 0.10. Would the option price change if we used μ=0.10\mu = 0.10 instead of r=0.04r = 0.04 in the simulation? If yes, by how much (numerically)? If no, explain why not.

Hint

For the confidence interval, use C^±1.96σ^C/N\hat C \pm 1.96 \cdot \hat\sigma_C / \sqrt{N} where σ^C\hat\sigma_C is the sample standard deviation of the discounted payoffs.

Jump to the solution when you're ready.