CONTENTS

Jump-Diffusion Processes

Motivation: why this matters in quant finance

Pure geometric Brownian motion assumes prices move continuously. That assumption is useful for Black-Scholes, but it misses earnings gaps, default announcements, depeg events, exchange halts, and operational-loss arrivals. Those events are not "large Brownian moves"; they are discontinuities.
Lawler's jump-process chapter makes the modelling fork precise. If a process keeps independent and stationary increments but drops continuous paths, the basic new building blocks are Poisson processes and compound Poisson processes. A jump-diffusion is the finance version of combining a Brownian diffusion with one of those jump components.

The payoff is not a catalogue of named models. It is the algebra of jumps: jump arrival times, jump-size distributions, characteristic exponents, generators, compensators, and quadratic variation. Those are the objects that later become jump-risk premia, incomplete-market hedging errors, and integro-differential pricing equations.

The informal idea

A diffusion moves all the time in small rough increments. A jump process waits, then moves suddenly. A compound Poisson process separates those two questions:

  1. When does a jump arrive? A Poisson process NtN_t counts arrivals at rate λ\lambda.
  2. How big is the jump? Independent jump sizes Y1,Y2,Y_1,Y_2,\ldots specify the marks.

The cumulative jump process is

Jt=i=1NtYi.J_t=\sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i.

Adding a Brownian component gives the simplest jump-diffusion log-return model:

Xt=mt+σWt+Jt.X_t=mt+\sigma W_t+J_t.

The Brownian part captures ordinary diffusive noise. The compound Poisson part captures a finite number of discontinuous shocks over finite horizons.

Formal definitions

Let WtW_t be Brownian motion, let NtN_t be a Poisson process with rate λ\lambda, and let Y1,Y2,Y_1,Y_2,\ldots be i.i.d. jump sizes independent of both WW and NN. A basic jump-diffusion log process is
Xt=mt+σWt+i=1NtYi.X_t=mt+\sigma W_t+\sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i.

An exponential asset-price version is

St=S0eXt.S_t=S_0e^{X_t}.
The jump part is a compound Poisson process. Lawler parameterises it through a finite measure
μ=λμ#,\mu=\lambda \mu^\#,

where μ#\mu^\# is the jump-size distribution. The total mass μ(R)=λ\mu(\mathbb{R})=\lambda is the jump rate, and μ(A)\mu(A) is the first-order rate of jumps whose sizes fall in AA.

Key properties

Characteristic exponents add

For independent Lévy components, characteristic exponents add. A Brownian motion with drift mm and variance parameter σ2\sigma^2 has exponent

ims12σ2s2.ims-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2s^2.

A Poisson process with rate λ\lambda has exponent

λ(eis1).\lambda(e^{is}-1).

So the sum of Brownian motion and a unit-jump Poisson process has exponent

Ψ(s)=ims12σ2s2+λ(eis1).\Psi(s)=ims-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2s^2+\lambda(e^{is}-1).

For a compound Poisson process with Lévy measure μ\mu,

Ψ(s)=R(eisy1)dμ(y).\Psi(s)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\left(e^{isy}-1\right)\,d\mu(y).

The generator has a diffusion part and a jump part

For a unit-jump Poisson process, the generator is

Lf(x)=λ[f(x+1)f(x)].Lf(x)=\lambda[f(x+1)-f(x)].

For a Brownian motion with drift and an independent unit-jump Poisson component,

Lf(x)=mf(x)+12σ2f(x)+λ[f(x+1)f(x)].Lf(x)=mf'(x)+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2f''(x)+\lambda[f(x+1)-f(x)].

For a compound Poisson component,

Lf(x)=R[f(x+y)f(x)]dμ(y).Lf(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}[f(x+y)-f(x)]\,d\mu(y).

This operator is the jump-process analogue of the diffusion generator.

Compensation removes predictable jump drift

If

mJ=Rydμ(y)m_J=\int_{\mathbb{R}}y\,d\mu(y)

exists, then the compensated process

Mt=JttmJM_t=J_t-tm_J
is a martingale. In finance, compensation is the jump analogue of subtracting drift: it separates expected arrival severity from surprise jump risk.

Jump quadratic variation is a sum of squared jumps

For a compound Poisson process,

Jt=st(ΔJs)2.\langle J\rangle_t=\sum_{s\le t}(\Delta J_s)^2.

Unlike Brownian quadratic variation, this is random. It depends on which jumps actually occurred and how large they were.

Worked examples

Example 1: one-day jump probability

If jump arrivals have annual rate λ=2\lambda=2, then over one trading day Δt=1/252\Delta t=1/252,

P(NΔt1)=1e2/2520.0079.\mathbb{P}(N_{\Delta t}\ge 1)=1-e^{-2/252}\approx 0.0079.

The chance is small on any one day, but over a year the probability of at least one jump is

1e20.865.1-e^{-2}\approx 0.865.

This is why finite-activity jumps can be almost invisible at daily horizons yet dominate tail scenarios over longer horizons.

Example 2: generator of a fixed-loss jump model

Suppose a log-price has Brownian noise plus jumps of fixed size a-a arriving at rate λ\lambda:

Xt=mt+σWtaNt.X_t=mt+\sigma W_t-aN_t.

Its generator is

Lf(x)=mf(x)+12σ2f(x)+λ[f(xa)f(x)].Lf(x)=mf'(x)+\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2f''(x)+\lambda[f(x-a)-f(x)].

The final term says that, in a small time interval, the only first-order jump event moves the state from xx to xax-a.

Example 3: compensated jump P&L

Let Jt=i=1NtYiJ_t=\sum_{i=1}^{N_t}Y_i and assume E[Yi]\mathbb{E}[Y_i] is finite. Since E[Jt]=λtE[Y]\mathbb{E}[J_t]=\lambda t\mathbb{E}[Y], the compensated process

Mt=JtλtE[Y]M_t=J_t-\lambda t\mathbb{E}[Y]

has zero conditional drift. It is the jump-risk part of the process after removing the predictable mean arrival severity.

Common confusions and pitfalls

"A jump is just a very large Brownian move." No. Brownian paths are continuous. A jump process has discontinuities and left limits XtX_{t-} that matter at jump times.
"The Poisson rate determines jump size." The rate controls arrival frequency. The jump-size distribution controls severity. Compound Poisson models keep these separate.
"Compensating a jump process removes jumps." Compensation removes predictable drift, not discontinuities. JttmJJ_t-tm_J still jumps.
"The quadratic variation of a jump process is deterministic like Brownian motion." For compound Poisson processes it is the realised sum of squared jumps, hence random.
"Adding jumps preserves complete-market Black-Scholes hedging." The source text does not develop market completeness, but the modelling lesson is already visible: Brownian noise and jump arrivals are different risk sources, and a stock-plus-bond hedge cannot mechanically remove arbitrary jump-size risk.

Where this goes next

References

  • Lawler, G. F. (2023). Stochastic Calculus: An Introduction with Applications. Ch. 6 §6.1 (Lévy processes), §6.2 (Poisson process), §6.3 (Compound Poisson process).
Jump-Diffusion Processes | q4quant.studio