CONTENTS

Exercise: Minimum-Variance Portfolio from a 3×3 Σ\Sigma

Prerequisites: Covariance Matrices

Problem

Using the covariance matrix from the previous exercise:

Σ=(0.040.020.010.020.090.030.010.030.16),\Sigma = \begin{pmatrix}0.04 & 0.02 & 0.01 \\ 0.02 & 0.09 & 0.03 \\ 0.01 & 0.03 & 0.16\end{pmatrix},
find the minimum-variance portfolio subject to 1w=1\mathbf{1}^\top w = 1 (full investment, no short-sale constraint).
  1. Set up the optimisation: minimise wΣww^\top\Sigma w subject to 1w=1\mathbf{1}^\top w = 1. Use a Lagrange multiplier to derive the closed-form solution w=Σ111Σ11.w^* = \frac{\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{1}^\top\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf{1}}.

  2. Compute Σ1\Sigma^{-1} numerically and then ww^* for this Σ\Sigma.

  3. Compute the minimum-variance portfolio's variance wΣww^{*\top}\Sigma w^* and standard deviation (annualised volatility).

  4. Interpret the weights. Compare the minimum-variance portfolio's weights to the equal-weighted portfolio w=(1/3,1/3,1/3)w = (1/3, 1/3, 1/3). Which asset gets the largest weight, and why? (Hint: look at the diagonals of Σ\Sigma and the off-diagonals.)

Hint

For part 1: the Lagrangian is L(w,λ)=wΣwλ(1w1)\mathcal{L}(w, \lambda) = w^\top\Sigma w - \lambda(\mathbf{1}^\top w - 1). First-order conditions give 2Σw=λ12\Sigma w = \lambda\mathbf{1}, so w=(λ/2)Σ11w = (\lambda/2)\Sigma^{-1}\mathbf{1}. The constraint 1w=1\mathbf{1}^\top w = 1 determines λ\lambda.

Jump to the solution when you're ready.