CONTENTS

Exercise: Delta of a Digital Option vs. Vanilla

Prerequisites: Delta

Problem

A digital (binary) cash-or-nothing call pays $1 if ST>KS_T > K and $0 otherwise. Under Black-Scholes with q=0q = 0, its price is
D(S,t)=er(Tt)Φ(d2),d2=ln(S/K)+(r12σ2)(Tt)σTt.D(S, t) = e^{-r(T-t)}\Phi(d_2), \qquad d_2 = \frac{\ln(S/K) + (r - \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma^2)(T-t)}{\sigma\sqrt{T-t}}.
  1. Compute ΔD=D/S\Delta_D = \partial D/\partial S in closed form.

  2. Evaluate ΔD\Delta_D at S=100,K=100,T=0.5,r=0.05,σ=0.2S = 100, K = 100, T = 0.5, r = 0.05, \sigma = 0.2. Compare to Δcall\Delta_{\text{call}} for a vanilla call with same parameters.

  3. Limit as expiry approaches. Compute ΔD\Delta_D at tt close to TT (e.g. Tt=0.001T - t = 0.001) for S=100,K=100S = 100, K = 100. What happens? Why is digital hedging harder than vanilla hedging near expiry?
  4. Practical mitigation. A market maker selling a digital typically over-hedges by replacing the digital with a tight call spread (Call(Kϵ)Call(K+ϵ))/(2ϵ)(\text{Call}(K - \epsilon) - \text{Call}(K + \epsilon))/(2\epsilon). Explain why this makes the position easier to hedge, even though it's no longer exactly a digital.

Hint

For part 1: Φ(d2)/S=ϕ(d2)d2/S=ϕ(d2)/(SσTt)\partial\Phi(d_2)/\partial S = \phi(d_2)\cdot \partial d_2/\partial S = \phi(d_2)/(S\sigma\sqrt{T-t}). Be careful with the er(Tt)e^{-r(T-t)} factor.

Jump to the solution when you're ready.